Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cliff's avatar

Good question, Julie. I put it to the Dragonslayer who wisely responded ...

Here are some specific steps that could be taken to persuade an increasingly sceptical public to adopt a panocracy:

- Educate the public about the potential benefits and drawbacks of panocracy. This could be done through public forums, online resources, and other educational materials.

- Demonstrate that panocracy can be made to work effectively. This could be done by implementing panocracy on a small scale or by conducting simulations.

- Address the concerns of the public about the potential flaws of panocracy. This could be done by providing assurances about the safeguards that would be put in place to prevent these flaws from occurring.

If these steps are taken, then it may be possible to persuade a sceptical public to adopt a panocracy. However, it is important to remember that panocracy is a complex and challenging system, and it is not clear whether it would be successful in practice.

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

I take your point that we are already involved in a toxic relationship with big tech. I think the difference then, is that Panocracy is trying to be transparent and gain consent in advance of implementation.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts